Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of the Effect of Trim Angle on Planing Stepped Hulls
Keywords:
Computational fluid dynamics, froude number, hydrodynamic resistance, stepped planing hull, trim angleAbstract
This study investigates the hydrodynamic influence of trim angle variation on a stepped planing hull using computational fluid dynamics. The analyses were performed in ANSYS Fluent under steady-state RANS conditions with the SST k–ω turbulence model and a Volume of Fluid multiphase setup. Two scenarios were examined: a hull with no trim and a hull trimmed by 1.6°. The computational domain consisted of 3,572,223 elements with high mesh quality metrics, ensuring accurate free-surface and near-wall resolution. Quantitative results show that in the non-trimmed configuration, the maximum flow velocity reached 20.8 m·s⁻¹, with an average of 17.0 m·s⁻¹ near the hull, while the 1.6° trimmed case exhibited a slightly lower mean surface velocity of 15–16 m·s⁻¹ but a more elongated wake. The maximum turbulence kinetic energy decreased from 18 m²·s⁻² to 9.6 m²·s⁻², indicating reduced turbulence intensity and a more stable wake structure. The total drag force decreased dramatically from 22,592.89 N to 3,009.294 N, representing an 86.68% reduction in drag under identical conditions. This improvement is attributed to flow acceleration beneath the bow and the redistribution of pressure and viscous forces. However, this unusually large reduction reflects the idealized fixed-hull simulation conditions and far exceeds typical empirical improvements, indicating that caution is needed in interpreting these results. The results suggest that minor positive trim angles can substantially lower hydrodynamic resistance in this stepped planing hull configuration. Compared to prior studies, the magnitude of drag reduction observed here far exceeds reported values, largely because a simplified hull model is used at a high Froude number with the hull fixed in trim and heave.
References
Bayraktar, M., Göksu, B., & Yüksel, O. (2025). Matching of propulsion system components for a planing hull model. Ships and Offshore Structures, 20(6), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2024.2356949
Cambaz, A., Görgülü, Y. F., & Arat, H. (2021). Two-Phase Numerical Modelling of a Wet Exhaust System in a Catamaran Motor Yacht Diesel Engine. European Journal of Science and Technology, (31),165–170. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1007351
Cucinotta, F., Mancini, D., Sfravara, F., & Tamburrino, F. (2021). The Effect of Longitudinal Rails on an Air Cavity Stepped Planing Hull.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(5), Article 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050470
De Marco, A., Mancini, S., Miranda, S., Scognamiglio, R., & Vitiello, L.(2017). Experimental and numerical hydrodynamic analysis of a stepped planing hull. Applied Ocean Research, 64, 135–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.02.004
Deng, R., Wang, S., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, T. (2021). The effect of hull form parameters on the hydrodynamic performance of a bulk carrier. Journal ofMarine Science and Engineering, 9(4), Article 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040373
Deshpande, S., Sundsbø, P., & Das, S. (2020). Ship resistance analysis using CFD simulations in Flow-3D. International Journal of Multiphysics, 14(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.14.3.227
European Boating Industry. (2023). Facts & Figures. https://www.europeanboatingindustry.eu/about-the-industry/facts-and-figures
Göksu, B., Erginer, K. E., & Öner, G. (2024). Comparison of submarine hull morphologies obtained by biomimicry method with DARPA SUBOFF. Naval Engineers Journal, 136(3), 87–104.
Gorgulu, Y. F. (2024). Thermal efficiency evaluation in shell-and-tube heat exchangers: A CFD-based parametric study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 240(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241262481
Gorgulu, Y. F. (2025). CFD-based cooling performance of gas turbine blades. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal, 98(2), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-01-2025-0037
ISO. (2019). ISO (2019/2025) ISO 12215-5: Small craft—Hull construction and scantlings. https://www.iso.org/standard/69552.html
ISO. (2021). ISO (2021) ISO 11592-2: Small craft—Determination of maximum propulsion power rating using manoeuvring speed. https://www.iso.org/standard/81925.html
Le, T.-H., Vu, M. T., Bich, V. N., Phuong, N. K., Ha, N. T. H., Chuan, T. Q., & Tu, T. N. (2021). Numerical investigation on the effect of trim on ship resistance by RANSE method. Applied Ocean Research, 111, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102642
Martić, I., Anušić, B., Degiuli, N., & Grlj, C. G. (2024). Numerically Investigating the Effect of Trim on the Resistance of a Container Ship in Confined and Shallow Water. Applied Sciences, 14(15), Article 6570. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156570
Nikolopoulos, L., & Boulougouris, E. (2019). A study on the statistical calibration of the holtrop and Mennen approximate power prediction method for full hull form, low froude number vessels. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 35(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.170034
NMMA. (2024a). 2023 Total Boat Registrations Report Highlights Trends in Boat Use. https://www.nmma.org/press/article/24858
NMMA. (2024b). U.S. Recreational Boating Statistical Abstract. https://www.nmma.org/statistics/publications/statistical-abstract
Pacuraru, F., Mandru, A., & Bekhit, A. (2022). CFD Study on Hydrodynamic Performances of a Planing Hull.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(10), Article 1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10101523
Savitsky, D. (1964). Hydrodynamic Design of Planing Hulls. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 1(04), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.5957/mt1.1964.1.4.71
Sherbaz, S., & Duan, W. (2014). Ship Trim Optimization: Assessment of Influence of Trim on Resistance of MOERI Container Ship. The Scientific World Journal, 2014,Article 03695. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/603695
Terziev, M., Tezdogan, T., Demirel, Y. K., Villa, D., Mizzi, S., & Incecik, A. (2021). Exploring the effects of speed and scale on a ship’s form factor using CFD. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 13, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.12.002
Turan, B. İ., & Akman, M. (2021). Modeling and Comparison of Bodrum Gulets’ Hull Forms with Round and Transom Sterns. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.09327
Vitiello, L., Mancini, S., Bilandi, R. N., Dashtimanesh, A., De Luca, F., & Nappo, V. (2022). A comprehensive stepped planing hull systematic series: Part 1 -Resistance test. Ocean Engineering, 266, Article112242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112242
Yang, D., Sun, Z., Jiang, Y., & Gao, Z. (2019). A Study on the Air Cavity under a Stepped Planing Hull. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(12), Article 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7120468